El jue, 22-05-2025 a las 15:27 +0200, Actionless Loveless escribió: > Because /bin/edit normally assumed to be user-configurable > symlink/alias. Although indeed in Arch Linux it's owned by `vi` > package and I guess would be overwritten every time you update the > package.
Right now that would not happen because they are marked as conflicting packages so if you have vi you don't have edit or vice versa. > So from my opinion neither Microsoft's Edit, nor VIM packages should > be overwriting /usr/bin/edit. I can agree with this but it would have to be defined at the distribution level indicating that `/usr/bin/edit` is reserved for creating a symbolic link to the editor of your choice and (ideally) that a tool exists to make or maintain the symbolic link. Right now that is not defined and there is no tool that does it (automagically, of course). Greetings. -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
