Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> I'm fine with your idea. (Actually, I don't think it is much relevant > which "run" command is chosen, because LaTeXMK can run subordinate tools > like bibtex, makeindex, dvipdfmx in it, and can run latex multiple times > occasionally according to the dependency. If I understand correctly, > neither `TeX-run-format' nor `TeX-run-TeX' is suitable for such outputs. > I think that the user is responsible for choosing the suitable "run" > command if the default one isn't working, since LaTeXMK can do many > thing and AUCTeX can't know what the user intends to let LaTeXMK do.) Thanks for your response. You're of course right, in general, but I was hoping that this change helps to detect normal LaTeX errors and cure the current situation we have a little, at least. I pushed that change. Best, Arash P.S. I also had a look at bug#70807 again[1], I still don't have a clue how to fix it. Do you have an idea? Footnotes: [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70807
