Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: > I recommend the latter: Delete the couple of v14 changes we have, move > the entire chapter into history.texi and delete changes.texi.
OK, done. >> Does this count as a matter we should sort out? If so, I suppose we >> should add >> (require 'tex) >> in auctex.el. > Why should we load that huge file at startup? Am I missing something? I suppose that usres of `use-package' who impose immediate loading on purpose think that "I always use package foo in my emacs session and want to use it without autoloading delay when I begin to work on matters requiring foo. For me, loading foo.el always happens sooner or later, and I don't care the increment of emacs startup time. Thus foo should be loaded at emacs startup." (For AUCTeX, such users might as well do (use-package latex :after (tex)) additionally?) > We could replace that with the FIXME added by Stefan M.: > (require 'tex-site > (expand-file-name "tex-site.el" > (file-name-directory load-file-name))) > which is probably redundant: The feature tex-site is t when use-package > loads auctex.el and the form does nothing, but it is still much less > heavy than loading tex.el. It couldn't actually be in that form when we had to ensure that (unload-feature 'tex-site) to work for configure&make installation, but now we can. Hmm, it would be better for local Git repo users who still have (load "~/Development/auctex/auctex.el nil t t) in their config, than just removing the relevant code as I suggested...? Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
