Looks like it: http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/09/introducing-the-fedora-tools-image-for-fedora-atomic-host/ https://hub.docker.com/r/centos/tools/
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/27/2017 02:01 PM, Ben Breard wrote: > > Today we ship a “tools” container that’s *really* large, specifically > > it’s about 1.5 GB on disk. The feedback I’ve gotten from users is that > > it's too large to be useful and they try to avoid it. This of course > > makes me sad and I think we should take another look at it. Primarily > > this container contains debugging, performance, support utilities > > (sosreport), as well as man pages for packages only shipped on Atomic > > Host. I think splitting it up along these lines makes sense and will be > > intuitive for users. That said, there’s a fine line between some of the > > debugging and performance tools, so after looking at the package list, I > > think it makes sense to keep those together in the “2.0” tools container. > > Is this Tools container only used on RHEL, or is it used for > CentOS/Fedora as well? > > -- > -- > Josh Berkus > Project Atomic > Red Hat OSAS > -- Ben Breard Sr Technology Product Manager - Linux Containers Mobile: 972-816-9081
