On 06/27/2017 02:01 PM, Ben Breard wrote: > Today we ship a “tools” container that’s *really* large, specifically > it’s about 1.5 GB on disk. The feedback I’ve gotten from users is that > it's too large to be useful and they try to avoid it. This of course > makes me sad and I think we should take another look at it. Primarily > this container contains debugging, performance, support utilities > (sosreport), as well as man pages for packages only shipped on Atomic > Host. I think splitting it up along these lines makes sense and will be > intuitive for users. That said, there’s a fine line between some of the > debugging and performance tools, so after looking at the package list, I > think it makes sense to keep those together in the “2.0” tools container.
Is this Tools container only used on RHEL, or is it used for CentOS/Fedora as well? -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS
