Zero overhead, defunct process management, proper logging, simplicity, no moving parts, no additional unit file (I don't have unit files).
Turn it around - if I have the command line "ansible-playbook ...", what does systemd get me? On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Eric Paris <epa...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 21:22 -0500, Clayton Coleman wrote: > > They'd be really helpful for cases where you don't want full blown > > systemd, but want a long running container that needs to reap > > processes. I don't know that one or the other matters, I have a > > slight bias for dumb-init in terms of signal rewriting (a few cases > > might need that). > > > > Anyone using these today? > > What does dumb-init or tini get me that systemd doesn't? >
