On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 21:22 -0500, Clayton Coleman wrote: > They'd be really helpful for cases where you don't want full blown > systemd, but want a long running container that needs to reap > processes. I don't know that one or the other matters, I have a > slight bias for dumb-init in terms of signal rewriting (a few cases > might need that). > > Anyone using these today?
What does dumb-init or tini get me that systemd doesn't?
