On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:03:32AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Well, there's no reason why a systemd designed for just container init > couldn't be tiny; it's requirements would be so much less than one > running outside a container. But it would be essentially a new piece of > software.
That seems like a huge investment, both in development and in continued maintenance. I think we'd be better served putting that effort (or a fraction of it!) into making the thing we have better suited. We've definitely got a ways to go here — our base image is very large by any standard, let alone compared to alpine or busybox. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader
