Here https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles And here
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fedora-dockerfiles/ On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, 9:56 PM Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > Sure, but I have no idea how to? > > On 09/14/2016 12:34 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > would you please update this > > https://hub.docker.com/r/fedora/systemd-systemd/ > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Muayyad AlSadi <als...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Awesome! >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, 3:51 PM Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 09/14/2016 05:26 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: >>> >>> Nice article. >>> >>> I would like to stress that docker is intended to be process container >>> not system container. >>> >>> In adeal (aka. Fictional unicorn) containers you would have a single >>> process. Your start.sh should exec (to replace the shell) the application >>> ("exec node ." Or "exec java -jar start.jar") >>> >>> Many applications does not fit such restrictions. People end up using >>> things like supervisord (a python script that manage multiple processes ) >>> but of course it won't work out of the box. One need to rewrite services >>> into its .ini format. >>> >>> We have seen many fake systemds that are not 100% compatible. >>> >>> Having real systemd would make dockerizing such apps a trivial job. >>> >>> I would love if real systemd that just work. that fail gracefully for >>> example when it does not have cgroups mounted it would just ignore >>> cgroups-related directives. >>> >>> I wish if I just run >>> >>> docker run -dt fedora-systemd >>> >>> Without any -v >>> >>> How far are we from this? >>> >>> We have it now, that is what is talked about in the end of the article, >>> oci-systemd--hook. >>> >>> On Sep 13, 2016 8:55 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/09/13/running-systemd-in-a-non-privileged-container/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > >
