On 09/14/2016 05:26 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>
> Nice article.
>
> I would like to stress that docker is intended to be process container
> not system container.
>
> In adeal (aka. Fictional unicorn) containers you would have a single
> process. Your start.sh should exec (to replace the shell) the
> application ("exec node ." Or "exec java -jar start.jar")
>
> Many applications does not fit such restrictions. People end up using
> things like supervisord (a python script that manage multiple
> processes ) but of course it won't work out of the box. One need to
> rewrite services into its .ini format.
>
> We have seen many fake systemds that are not 100% compatible.
>
> Having real systemd would make dockerizing such apps a trivial job.
>
> I would love if real systemd that just work. that fail gracefully for
> example when it does not have cgroups mounted it would just ignore
> cgroups-related directives.
>
> I wish if I just run
>
> docker run -dt fedora-systemd
>
> Without any -v
>
> How far are we from this?
>
>
We have it now, that is what is talked about in the end of the article,
oci-systemd--hook.
> On Sep 13, 2016 8:55 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwa...@redhat.com
> <mailto:dwa...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/09/13/running-systemd-in-a-non-privileged-container/
>
> <http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/09/13/running-systemd-in-a-non-privileged-container/>
>
>
