Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> writes: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote: > >> What do you all think about this? What are the criteria for allowing >> storaged into the root filesystem? > > Note we're working on a new SPC design, it might be possible for > storaged to run under that. But that's an implementation detail, the > design is more important.
Alright, I take this as "Whether or not we use storaged, and whether or not it is in a container or not is an implementation detail." I'll start with plain storaged then, and move to storaged-in-a-container once the pressure is high enough. As the the bigger picture, I can only nod my head to what you say about storage being difficult and important. However, the d-s-s UI is nicely concrete, implementable, and useful, so I'd say we should go for it even if much else needs to be done.
