On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Peter wrote: > Just to clarify Kubernetes PVs/PVCs is in a separate set of designs and > work is in progress, actually some initial basic functionality just > landed in master.
That's cool! I'll have to try this soon. Where are the design links? > So I think considering the docker storage use case > separately does make sense. Let's clarify then by saying "Docker *image* storage"? Although it's not clear to me whether the initial designs are scoping in containers too. I assume so, but personally...I think anyone storing any substantial data, and definitely any persistent data in container image overlays is just "doing it wrong". I guess a subtask in this thread should really be "modernize http://www.projectatomic.io/docs/docker-storage-recommendation/";.
