On Mon, Mar 28, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> At this point there is no known reason (at least to me) not to release > 1.10 because of kube. Is there anything tracking this outside of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/19720 ? I need to try it myself. > So I don't see a real reason to need 2 versions installed from a user > story point of view. And the fact that there is only one version of > docker supported in a fedora release at a time leads bolsters my > feelings like this is not something a user would need/want. In which > case it makes me ask 'obviously I'm missing the point, why is someone > asking for this?' I think beyond Kube, there were OSBS issues with 1.10 (the V2 transition is a lot more traumatic there) that are mostly sorted now. > I can only assume it is because of the pain involved in changing the > version of a package when using rpmostree as a developer. Which makes > me ask, 'should we be using atomic in this case?' When the explicit use > case is about quickly iterating between two versions of packages and > rpmostree is about entire images, it just seems like we have an > impeedance mismatch which maybe shouldn't be 'solved'... It's like I saw this comment coming in my crystal ball: https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2016-March/msg00128.html Give it a try! =)
