Does it make sense to configure it through alternatives? On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Andy Goldstein <agold...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Ok, makes sense. > > I'm +1 to having the ability to test out newer Docker versions. How would > they ship - in 1 RPM, or multiple? > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016, at 09:31 AM, Andy Goldstein wrote: >> > Would this be with SCL, or some other means? >> >> The SCL model/tools become more useful when dynamic linking is in play, >> but currently >> in our usage of golang there aren't any beyond a few system ones. So I >> think it would >> work to just have e.g. >> /usr/libexec/docker-1.10 >> /usr/libexec/docker-1.9 >> >> And choose via a config file in /etc/sysconfig/docker which to run. >> >> (And even if we did introduce dynamic linking, using rpath I think is >> saner for this case) >> >> >> >> > -- Jason DeTiberus
