here is a bug introduced by docker 1.10 https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/issues/1706
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > It is in rawhide now. > > > On 02/10/2016 11:46 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > > Well we probably need you guys playing with this, if there is a problem > so we can figure out how to fix it. > > Drop me an email when it's pushed to rawhide. > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 4:12 PM Daniel J Walsh < <dwa...@redhat.com> > dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Well we probably need you guys playing with this, if there is a problem >> so we can figure out how to fix it. >> >> >> On 02/10/2016 03:22 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: >> >> my concern is the built in DNS in new docker 1.10 and how to disable it >> to use the one provided by freeipa and dnsmasq backed by consul or skydns >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Jason Brooks < <jbro...@redhat.com> >> jbro...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: "Josh Berkus" < <jber...@redhat.com>jber...@redhat.com> >>> > To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io >>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 12:14:01 AM >>> > Subject: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into >>> Fedora23 >>> > >>> > Folks, >>> > >>> > We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf and became >>> very >>> > concerned about the consequences of pushing it into Fedora23. I don't >>> think >>> > that users will be prepared for the upgrade process for existing >>> images. >>> > Basically, I can see two things happening to create some really unhappy >>> > users: (1) most of them ignore the update notice and then have a long >>> outage >>> > when they restart Docker, or (2) some of them run the migrator, and for >>> > users with dozens of images it makes their system unresponsive until >>> it's >>> > done. There's also a bunch of API changes, which *supposedly* don't >>> break >>> > backwards compatibility, but has anyone tested for this? >>> > >>> > Is it worth considering holding 1.10 back until Fedora24? >>> >>> F24 is set to release on June 7, docker makes a major release each >>> three months or so, and 1.9 is already three months old... >>> >>> I don't think it's possible to fully shield users from the fast dev >>> pace of docker while keeping fedora reasonably up-to-date. >>> >>> Docker just moves fast, we should kick our testing into a higher >>> gear to keep up. >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Josh Berkus >>> > Project Atomic >>> > Red Hat >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >
