It is in rawhide now.
On 02/10/2016 11:46 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>
> > Well we probably need you guys playing with this, if there is a
> problem so we can figure out how to fix it.
>
> Drop me an email when it's pushed to rawhide.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 4:12 PM Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com
> <mailto:dwa...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Well we probably need you guys playing with this, if there is a
> problem so we can figure out how to fix it.
>
>
> On 02/10/2016 03:22 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> my concern is the built in DNS in new docker 1.10 and how to
>> disable it to use the one provided by freeipa and dnsmasq backed
>> by consul or skydns
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com
>> <mailto:jbro...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Josh Berkus" <jber...@redhat.com
>> <mailto:jber...@redhat.com>>
>> > To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
>> <mailto:atomic-devel@projectatomic.io>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 12:14:01 AM
>> > Subject: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10
>> into Fedora23
>> >
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf
>> and became very
>> > concerned about the consequences of pushing it into
>> Fedora23. I don't think
>> > that users will be prepared for the upgrade process for
>> existing images.
>> > Basically, I can see two things happening to create some
>> really unhappy
>> > users: (1) most of them ignore the update notice and then
>> have a long outage
>> > when they restart Docker, or (2) some of them run the
>> migrator, and for
>> > users with dozens of images it makes their system
>> unresponsive until it's
>> > done. There's also a bunch of API changes, which
>> *supposedly* don't break
>> > backwards compatibility, but has anyone tested for this?
>> >
>> > Is it worth considering holding 1.10 back until Fedora24?
>>
>> F24 is set to release on June 7, docker makes a major release
>> each
>> three months or so, and 1.9 is already three months old...
>>
>> I don't think it's possible to fully shield users from the
>> fast dev
>> pace of docker while keeping fedora reasonably up-to-date.
>>
>> Docker just moves fast, we should kick our testing into a higher
>> gear to keep up.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Josh Berkus
>> > Project Atomic
>> > Red Hat
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
