I completely agree. Plus, Mani and Rahman hail from the Tamil film industry.....Also, Vikram is a MUCH better actor that Abhishek (not saying that Abhi is bad but Vikram is probably one of the top 5 in the country)...this clearly reeks of one version being favored over the other....also i find it offensive that the Hindi version is the only one being prepped to screen at Cannes.....but it could be the decision of the producers (Reliance).....
--- In [email protected], Indmov Buff <indmovb...@...> wrote: > > I hope this isn't true. If it is, I am disappointed. Not that it will be on > the 5th but that there won't be a formal launch. Hardly any promos as well. > What makes Raavanan different from Raavan? Why is Raavanan being given the > step motherly treatment ? It has Vikram, Prithviraj, Aishwarya, Maniratnam > and Rahman - these names are Huge in the South. > > > > ________________________________ > From: yeshrao81 <yeshra...@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, 30 April, 2010 14:21:34 > Subject: [arr] Raavanan audio on May 5 > > > http://sify. com/movies/ tamil/fullstory. php?id=14940190 > > On May 5 Sony Music will launch straight into the southern market, the audio > of Mani Ratnam's Raavanan. Sources have confirmed that there will be no > formal audio launch. > > The reasons given out are the non-availability of the stars mainly AR Rahman > and Mani Ratnam. The director is busy giving the final polish to the film > which he plans to screen outside of the festival at Cannes. > > However Big Pictures and Sony Music are planning to hold a promotional press > meet for Tamil Raavanan at a later date. >
