and who is this nadeem-shravan???? and himesh is still alive???
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Roshan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > may be India is the only universe he knows. :) > > Some times i do wonder if he is the same guy who made Satya and Company > (two movies I absolutely love) > > aah well, some frogs do live in a well. > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Chord <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> And his point is??? Himesh and NS have more universal appeal than ARR? (He >> has to remember that the word "universal" means not just all of India, but >> the rest of the world). If you mean "universal" to mean India AND the rest >> of the world (including non Indians), you cannot be serious in telling me >> that NS and Himesh are appreciated more than ARR. And as far as the sales >> argument, it maybe true that Himesh and NS sold more than ARR IN INDIA >> alone....who really knows? If you count sales of their music albums AROUND >> THE WORLD, ARR wins hands down, esp. with the recent Slumdog success. >> >> >> --- In [email protected] <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, >> "Jahanzeb Farooq" <jahanzebti...@...> wrote: >> > >> > From RGV's "My Reactions to Reactions" post on his blog: >> > >> > 18. Why is that a film cannot have a universal appeal like music can >> have? >> > >> > Ans: First of all it's wrong to presume that any one particular >> musicians work has universal appeal. >> > >> > In 2 periods of A.R.Rahman in the last 15 years Nadeem Shravan and >> Himesh Reshammiya's music sold much more than his. >> > >> > Also music in its final output pretty much has a singular emotion to >> carry whereas a film has too many variables for it to appeal to all. >> > >> > >> > http://rgvzoomin.com/2009/07/24/my-reactions-to-reactions-18/ >> > >> >> > > > -- > ----------------------------------- > http://ramblingsoul.com > http://2ic.in > > >
