i dont think shano should be compared to these songs. only one of the 
five songs you mentioned (Rukmani rukmani) i found little odd in the 
first hearing. all the rest i loved instantly or after some time. but 
shano is the song which when i heard the first time my feelings were  
"what the hell is this?" and "what is wrong with ARR?", and i skipped 
it in anger and disappointment. later i gave it second chance and now 
at least i dont skip it. 
but we shall remember that only we, the fans of ARR, will give it 
second chance, because we are his fans and because we know his music 
grow, a common man will never do it, he will simply skip it and will 
never listen it again and will only ridicule what went wrong with ARR. 
and he will be right because ARR never composed such a weak song 
before and that too for such a big movie as yuvvraaj. 
i will soon ask some of my non-ARR-fan friends to listen shano shano 
and will see if my prediction is correct or not.

--- In [email protected], "Arijit Debnath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Shano shano is getting critised everday in this forum.... ok I am 
taking
> this in a positive way thinking that Rahman may compose same genre 
song with
> more vibrant way....instead of discarding these kind of rhythmic 
scores.
> 
> But I thing this is one of the greatest song which will create great
> history.... It has got some strange tune built inside which is 
compelling to
> go to floor every time...same reaction I got in the song 
"Maramkothiye" from
> Ah Aha...
> 
> Shano Shano is taking me in trance while the female voice is 
rendering a
> beatiful tune.
> 
> I heard the same kind of critisism for "Rukmani Rukmani", "Humba 
Humba", to
> some extent "Chaiyan Chaiyan" (voice doesn'r suit Sahrukh etc), and 
more
> recently "Pappu" and "Taxi"....all these songs proved Rahman's 
capability to
> get everyone on the dance floor.... all these tunes has something 
strange in
> them...one can't sit idle listening to these songs I believe.... if 
that is
> not the case I'm insane....
> 
> Arijit
>



Reply via email to