oops there you go

http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/26jodha.htm


On 2/26/08, Indmov Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>    Thanks for sharing, Gomzy. Could you also give us the source/link of
> the article? Rediff?
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Gomzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:04:37 PM
> Subject: [ARR] Jodhaa Akbar stumbles in India, races ahead abroad
>
>  Ashutosh Gowariker's *Jodhaa Akbar<http://www.rediff.com/movies/jodha08.html>
> * would have become a loser at the box office if it had not done brilliantly
> overseas <http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/19jodhaa.htm>.
>
>
>
> Produced at the cost of Rs 40 crores, the film first ran into trouble when
> a section of the Rajput community 
> banned<http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/15ban.htm>it in Rajasthan.
>
>
>
> Gowariker called for a hurried press conference on February 16, a day
> after the film released, to defend it but the damage was already done. He
> argued that a character like Jodhaa existed in history and was married to
> Akbar, but the film still did not get an entry in Rajasthan. The Madhya
> Pradesh government soon banned the film in the second week of its release.
>
>
>
> As if that was not enough, multiplexes all over India refused to release
> the film on February 15, due to a profit-sharing dispute. The film released
> in multiplxes only the next day.
>
>
>
> "When the film did not release on the first day of release, *Jodhaa 
> Akbar*lost out badly. By the time a settlement was reached, the film had lost 
> the
> precious first day advantage. The exams period, 
> controversy<http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/06jodha.htm>and poor 
> release strategy was almost suicidal for
> *Jodhaa Akbar,*" Vinod Mirani, trade analyst for *rediff.com*, says
>
>
>
> Luckily, the overseas market saved the film.
>
>
>
> According to a release from Imagesmiths, the public relations firm that
> was handling *Jodhaa Akbar *for UTV, the film made Rs 52.70 crores in
> India in 10 days, and Rs 21.30 crores in the overseas market.
>
>
>
> The film made a whooping Rs 10 crores on the first day in the US and was
> among the all-time highest grossers like *Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna 
> [Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=kabhi%20alvida%20naa%20kehna>
> ]* and *Om Shanti Om*. It made Rs 5.60 crores in the UK.
>
>
>
> In the Gulf region, it did a business of Rs 3.20 crores, in Australia, it 
> grossed
> Rs 3.20 crores and among other centers, it did a business of Rs 1.15crores.
>
>
>
>
> Trade analysts, however, say what finally matters is not the gross
> collections but the net collections. And that, they say, would make *Jodhaa
> Akbar* an average to below average film at the box office.
>
>
>
> "The gross collections of a film does not matter; the net does. The gross
> includes costs like entertainment tax, show tax and municipal tax. UTV
> should declare its net collections," Mirani says.
>
>
>
> [image: new]
>
> "*Jodhaa Akbar *will scrape through because of its overseas business.
> It will also recover its money through satellite rights. But its theatrical
> business is not exciting for the film," added Mirani.
>
>
>
> Another trade analyst, Komal Nahta says, "The length of the film (*three
> hours 20 minutes*) was the biggest drawback for *Jodhaa Akbar*. But it
> will be a loser overall though overseas, it is doing well."
>
>
>
> He echoes Mirani's thoughts as he says, "The overseas release will not
> make the film sink to a disaster level."
>
>
>
> An exhibitor, on condition of anonymity, said that the film was not doing
> well because it was released at the wrong time, and since it did not appeal
> to the Indian youth.
>
>
>
> "The film is better suited for people above 45. Besides that, exams were
> on in many centers where the film was released. The music was decent but did
> not catch up in a big way. Thus, these factors affected the prospects of the
> film," he said.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ>
>
> 
>

Reply via email to