Ashutosh Gowariker's *Jodhaa Akbar<http://www.rediff.com/movies/jodha08.html>
* would have become a loser at the box office if it had not done brilliantly
overseas <http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/19jodhaa.htm>.



Produced at the cost of Rs 40 crores, the film first ran into trouble when a
section of the Rajput community
banned<http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/15ban.htm>it in
Rajasthan.



Gowariker called for a hurried press conference on February 16, a day after
the film released, to defend it but the damage was already done. He argued
that a character like Jodhaa existed in history and was married to Akbar,
but the film still did not get an entry in Rajasthan. The Madhya Pradesh
government soon banned the film in the second week of its release.



As if that was not enough, multiplexes all over India refused to release the
film on February 15, due to a profit-sharing dispute. The film released in
multiplxes only the next day.



"When the film did not release on the first day of release, *Jodhaa
Akbar*lost out badly. By the time a settlement was reached, the film
had lost the
precious first day advantage. The exams period,
controversy<http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/feb/06jodha.htm>and poor
release strategy was almost suicidal for
*Jodhaa Akbar,*" Vinod Mirani, trade analyst for *rediff.com*, says



Luckily, the overseas market saved the film.



According to a release from Imagesmiths, the public relations firm that was
handling *Jodhaa Akbar *for UTV, the film made Rs 52.70 crores in India in
10 days, and Rs 21.30 crores in the overseas market.



The film made a whooping Rs 10 crores on the first day in the US and was
among the all-time highest grossers like *Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna
[Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=kabhi%20alvida%20naa%20kehna>
]* and *Om Shanti Om*. It made Rs 5.60 crores in the UK.



In the Gulf region, it did a business of Rs 3.20 crores, in Australia,
it grossed
Rs 3.20 crores and among other centers, it did a business of Rs 1.15 crores.




Trade analysts, however, say what finally matters is not the gross
collections but the net collections. And that, they say, would make *Jodhaa
Akbar* an average to below average film at the box office.



"The gross collections of a film does not matter; the net does. The gross
includes costs like entertainment tax, show tax and municipal tax. UTV
should declare its net collections," Mirani says.



[image: new]

"*Jodhaa Akbar *will scrape through because of its overseas business.
It will also recover its money through satellite rights. But its theatrical
business is not exciting for the film," added Mirani.



Another trade analyst, Komal Nahta says, "The length of the film (*three
hours 20 minutes*) was the biggest drawback for *Jodhaa Akbar*. But it will
be a loser overall though overseas, it is doing well."



He echoes Mirani's thoughts as he says, "The overseas release will not make
the film sink to a disaster level."



An exhibitor, on condition of anonymity, said that the film was not doing
well because it was released at the wrong time, and since it did not appeal
to the Indian youth.



"The film is better suited for people above 45. Besides that, exams were on
in many centers where the film was released. The music was decent but did
not catch up in a big way. Thus, these factors affected the prospects of the
film," he said.

Reply via email to