Good man Patrick! As far as I'm concerned your work on a single arm distro is the single most important project in OpenBSD land at the moment.
I think the Cubox-I looks like an excellent consumer product. Thanks again, Laurence On Wednesday, 4 September 2013, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hello Laurence, > > we're heavily working on the ARM subtree, which will enable is to add a > port for > the i.MX6 SoC, too. > > I'm planning to add i.MX6 one the infrastructure is ready. It won't take > that long anymore. ;) > > Cubox-i could be supported, yes. I'd need to have a look at the > documentation, once it's > available. Maybe it already has some docs available... > > \Patrick > > Am 04.09.2013 um 22:10 schrieb Laurence Rochfort < > laurence.rochf...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>: > > > Hello all, > > > > This undeadly link seems to indicate there's quite some progress towards > > getting MX6 SoC working with OpenBSD. > > > > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20130725074102 > > > > Does this mean that Cubox-i would be supported? http://cubox-i.com > > > > Regards, > > Laurence.
