On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:59 PM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 5:11 PM David Farmer via ARIN-PPML > <[email protected]> wrote: > > While I’m willing to be convinced otherwise, I see no compelling > > reason to change from 7 to 14 days. I’m not strongly opposed to > > 14 days. But if no one is willing to make a first-person argument > > supporting the change to 14 days, then why make the change? >
[ clip ] > Devil's advocate: 7 days means the IP address manager who isn't > updating ARIN records with automation can't take a normal vacation. 14 > days is enough for someone to get their sunburn and then return and > process the backlog. We can't write policy based on recipient benefit or PTO programs. Many companies offer more than a week and authorize two. It doesn't scale. While we were told some large companies can't get it done, no-one said why. Without that add-on, I'd assume opex and then compare to the smaller networks who (so far) have not complained. A little equity? If it were because ARIN's systems are too slow for the volume, that could be interesting. HTH, -M< _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
