On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 5:11 PM David Farmer via ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> wrote: > While I’m willing to be convinced otherwise, I see no compelling > reason to change from 7 to 14 days. I’m not strongly opposed to > 14 days. But if no one is willing to make a first-person argument > supporting the change to 14 days, then why make the change?
Hi David, Devil's advocate: 7 days means the IP address manager who isn't updating ARIN records with automation can't take a normal vacation. 14 days is enough for someone to get their sunburn and then return and process the backlog. I have no dog in this fight, but as noted: staff reports some organizations having trouble with the 7-day period who would be satisfied with a 14-day period. While the information's anonymity reduces its weight, does that mean we should disregard it entirely? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
