I would support this. I was just going through section 6 for unrelated reasons and found 2 contradictions in the text within 10 minutes without even trying.
Tyler On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:47 -0400, Lily Edinam Botsyoe wrote: > Hi PPML, > > Section 6 of the NRPM, dedicated to IPv6, was originally added to the NRPM > from a global policy. As such, some language in the policy does not flow with > the language of the rest of the NRPM. Additionally, Section 6 makes numerous > references to both assignments and allocations, and assignment is now a > defunct term within the NRPM. > > Our ask: > > The AC would like to know if the PPML feels there is enough work to be done in > Section 6 to justify submitting a policy revising the language. We already > brought this topic up at the most recent ARIN public policy meeting but wanted > to ensure that members of the PPML had an opportunity to have their voices > heard as well. > > We look forward to hearing from you. > > Best regards, > Lily > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
