What does being non-profit have to do with not paying the executives that run the day by day of the organization ?
Fernando On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, 01:33 Steve Noble, <[email protected]> wrote: > Since they are a non-profit, they could also cut executive salaries. As of > 2019, John was being paid over $546,000 to respond to posts on mailing > lists. > > https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/541860956 > Key Employees and Officers Compensation > JOHN CURRAN (CEO AND PRESIDENT) $546,029 > RICHARD JIMMERSON (COO) $347,120 > JOHN SWEETING (SR. DIRECTOR, RSD) $279,352 > MARK KOSTERS (CTO) $276,796 > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021, 9:17 PM Mark McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Our rate hike alone covers the cost of responding to concerned >> organizations questioning why such a massive rate hike is needed that >> targets the smallest half of ARIN’s user base. You realize the only reason >> people are complaining (and you’re on these forums defending it) is because >> such a few increase is almost unheard of, correct? Of course the >> mega-carriers aren’t on here complaining - they’re paying less than *1%* of >> what /24 holders do. Just wait until the actual bills go out. >> >> ARIN’s “a /8 ISP assignment costs just as much as a /24 end user” >> reasoning is ridiculous. >> >> Not only is it untrue, it’s counterintuitive to reward organizations to >> request and maintain large assignments of a finite resource when there is >> absolutely zero incentive to return address space that isn’t needed. It’s >> “taxing” the small organizations to fund the larger ones. If you took into >> account that most large address space owners hold numerous blocks, their >> per IPv4 resource cost only gets less and less. >> >> Again, I ask how ARIN feels it costs more than $1000 to respond to each >> ticket. Id absolutely love to see how ARIN is losing money on our account. >> >> I’m all for per / transaction fees - pay for what you use. But what ARIN >> has passed with zero outreach is counterproductive to everything ARIN is >> supposed to represent - fairness and a steward of limited IPv4 resources. >> >> Seeing the CEO of ARIN on these forums advocating for the behemoths of >> the internet at the cost of small organizations is disheartening. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Sep 18, 2021, at 4:03 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On 17 Sep 2021, at 11:40 PM, arin-ppml <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Why not let them choose? They don’t really get any benefit from being >> an LIR member and since they aren’t running a local registry even though >> they are an ISP, why force them into the LIR category? >> > >> > They don’t need to have a relationship with ARIN, but opt to do so in >> order to have number resources in the registry system that are independent >> of their service provider. That means a contract with ARIN for services >> and thus sharing in the cost recovery model. >> > >> > You can assert that ARIN's costs are predominantly the result of “LIRs” >> but that doesn’t reflect reality – many of our services and functions are >> equivalent for an entire address block and only a small set of them are >> related to subdelegation functions. >> > >> > Furthermore, there are costs that ARIN incurs as a result of customers >> that have no relation at all to the customers individual utilization of >> services or their choice to subdelegate, but still must be recovered (e.g. >> costs of responding to customers on mailing lists…) >> > >> > FYI, >> > /John >> > >> > John Curran >> > President and CEO >> > American Registry for Internet Numbers >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ARIN-PPML >> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
