> On Sep 15, 2021, at 13:49 , John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 15 Sep 2021, at 4:33 PM, [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Is the overall impact of this fee change revenue neutral, or is this a total 
>> increase or decrease???  If an increase or decrease, by how much?
>> 
>> Also, has anything been done regarding the cost difference per IP address 
>> between those in the smallest brackets, versus the largest brackets.  The 
>> last thing I remember is that those in the smallest bracket were paying over 
>> 10x per address versus the largest bracket.  Is this still true??
>> Albert - 
>> 
> 
> Albert - 
> 
> The fee schedule categories were not changed, so it remains that those with 
> larger total resources pay less per individual IP address.   Having all 
> customers pay the same fee schedule results in approx $3.6M additional 
> revenue (see the table below for distribution)  – those with the smallest 
> holdings of number resources generally see a decease and those with larger 
> holdings see an corresponding increase based on total resources held.

As noted previously, those with forcibly bifurcated organizations because they 
hold both IPv4 LRSA and IPv6 RSA addresses are severely penalized in this 
process.

Owen

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to