On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:59 PM Joe Provo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:40:25AM -0700, Chris Woodfield wrote: > > Hi, > > > > These changes make sense and I am in support. My one question is > > - am I correct to assume that where the term ???number resources??? > > is replaced with ???addresses???, the intent is to clarify that the > > clause in question does not apply to ASNs, only address space? And > > if so, does this result in any potential change in effective policy > > that would take this out of the editorial realm? > > The only such changes are where the phrase "IPv4 number resources" > occurs to align with the preferred expression of "IPv4 addresses". > Note 8.2 "Internet number resources [...]" remains unchanged, as > does 8.3 "Number resources [...]" and 8.4 "Number resources received > [...]". > That makes perfect sense to me. +1
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
