Yes I would like that change.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Andrew Dul 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

It sounds like our recollections of what we intended for ISP initial 
allocations have diverged. I will admit when I drafted the problem statement I 
did not go back through email to see if there was anything about this issue.

Assuming we harmonize the problem statement, would you prefer the /24 as 
initial no questions asked size or a /21?

What do others prefer?

.Andrew

On Nov 21, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Scott Leibrand 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I believe this problem statement is incorrect, and therefore oppose the policy 
proposal as-is.

8.5.4 was intended (by me, as one of the authors, and in PPML discussions I 
just pulled up) to allow ISPs to transfer a /24 without justification.  It was 
*not* intended to "match the previous policy" in 4.2.2.

8.5.5 reads "8.5.5. Block size
Organizations may qualify for the transfer of a larger initial block, or an 
additional block, by providing documentation to ARIN which details the use of 
at least 50% of the requested IPv4 block size within 24 months. An officer of 
the organization shall attest to the documentation provided to ARIN."

The intention was that any ISP needing a /21 would need to "provide 
documentation to ARIN which details the use of at least 50% of the requested 
IPv4 block size within 24 months", with officer attestation to same.

If that policy is deemed insufficient, and we believe it's better to allow 
transfers of up to /21 without providing documentation to ARIN and officer 
attestation of such, then this proposal would need to be re-written with a new 
problem statement justifying that.

-Scott

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:40 PM, ARIN <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
On 16 November 2017, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced "ARIN-prop-244: 
Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP Transfers" to Draft Policy 
status.

Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9 is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_9.html

You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate 
the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft policy with 
ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy 
Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:

* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
* Technically Sound
* Supported by the Community

The PDP can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

Regards,

Sean Hopkins
Policy Analyst
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)



Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP 
Transfers

Problem Statement:

It was noted at the ARIN 40 Policy Experience Report, that there is an 
inconsistency in the initial block size for ISPs. Section 4.2.2 notes that the 
initial ISP block size should be /21 whereas the initial block size in 8.5.4 is 
noted as "minimum transfer size" which is effectively a /24. The intent of the 
new 8.5.4 was to match the previous policy. This policy is intended to clarify 
this issue. It was noted that ARIN staff current operational practice is to 
allow ISPs an initial /21 for Section 8 transfers.

Policy statement:

Add the following to 8.5.4

ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN qualify 
for an initial allocation of up to a /21.

Comments:

a. Timetable for implementation: Immediate
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to