+1. Well said, Andrew.
Owen > On Aug 14, 2015, at 11:25 , Andrew Dul <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think we want to have a policy where we give out an ipv6 /48 per ipv4 > /24. I'm all for giving people the space they need, but v6 is a different > mindset than v4. A /48 per site has generally been the goal of most ipv6 > policies. > > Andrew > > On 8/11/2015 3:05 PM, Alfie Cleveland wrote: >> John - >> >> Apologies if I wasn’t entirely clear. As referenced in Section 9.3.1. of the >> APNIC INPP, I propose that this also applies to end users - allowing end >> users to, free of charge, receive a /48 for each /24 they hold. >> >> Regards, >> Alfie >> >> >>> On 11 Aug 2015, at 23:01, John Curran < >>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Alfie Cleveland < >>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I’m requesting comment in regards to automatically make organisations >>>> eligible for IPv6 if they hold justified IPv4 space. This similar to >>>> Section 9.3.1. of the [APNIC-127] APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies. >>>> I feel that if organisations were able to receive a /48 for each /24 they >>>> hold, then it would help expedite the rollout of IPv6. Organisations >>>> currently have two choices - continue to use IPv4, or spend valuable time >>>> on applying for IPv6 space. IPv6 space is clearly in abundance - and this >>>> could potentially help slow the exhaustion of IPv4. >>> >>> >>> Alfie - >>> >>> Per NRPM 6.5.2.2, an ISP qualifies for an IPv6 allocation if they have a >>> previously justified IPv4 ISP >>> allocation from ARIN (or one of its predecessor registries), or can qualify >>> for an IPv4 ISP allocation >>> under current criteria; i.e. this means that they presently are >>> automatically eligible for IPv6 if they >>> hold IPv4 space, as you suggest above. >>> >>> Perhaps you are proposing that there be a default automatic size of IPv6 >>> allocation ("a /48 for each >>> /24 they hold”) which would allow for more expeditious preparation of IPv6 >>> initial requests, for those >>> who choose to receive this default allocation size rather than calculating >>> the "smallest nibble-boundary >>> aligned block that can provide an equally sized nibble-boundary aligned >>> block to each of the requesters >>> serving sites large enough to satisfy the needs of the requesters largest >>> single serving site using no >>> more than 75% of the available addresses”? >>> >>> /John >>> >>> John Curran >>> President and CEO >>> ARIN >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml> >> Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any >> issues. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
