Sounds reasonable to me. My experience with ARIN is that they are in the position of having to guide the classification of end-user or ISP/LIR, rather than having the requesting organization make that choice.
Organizations should have the option of selecting end-user or ISP/LIR according to their own needs. The organization then bears the burden of complying with the respective rules. Tim:> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kevin Blumberg <[email protected]> wrote: > The Sheppard's and the author have been working on revising the policy > text for 2013-5 based on feedback at the last PPC in New Orleans. > > The primary issue with the existing policy text is that it would change > the definition for existing end users and ISP's in unintended ways. > > A revised text is being suggested and we are looking for feedback from the > community. The goal of the new text is to help staff in selecting > which category a request should fall under. In the case of new > technologies it would require the requestor to provide information when they > are requesting via an End User template. > > Proposed text: > > Retain existing NRPM text. > > Add to Section 2: > > Any organization which does not clearly fit into one of the above > categories shall be treated as an LIR/ISP for policy purposes. > > Thanks, > > Kevin Blumberg > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > -- Tim:>
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
