On 6/14/24 03:54, Dave Howorth wrote:
[snip]
[ 1035.285] (II) intel(0): switch to [email protected] on VGA1
using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none
[ 1035.296] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 285
After update to 6.9.4 that becomes:
[snip]
[ 5371.571] (II) intel(0): switch to [email protected] on VGA1
using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none
[ 5371.576] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 270 x 203
[snip]
/^.............//' 6.9.4-Xorg.0.log)
No remarkable difference other than the resolutions chosen.
The physical screen size (and implied aspect ratio) is also very
different. Is either correct?
Yes, the 6.9.3 kernel gets it right. Every other kernel since arch was
installed on 1/8/17 has gotten it right. Something in 6.9.4 seems to have
changed. Likely an unintended side effect of some other change.
Bug opened:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/linux/-/issues/62
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
