As long as you publish it --srs ________________________________ From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-boun...@ripe.net> on behalf of Leo Vegoda <l...@vegoda.org> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 6:08:59 PM To: Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> Cc: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > > On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote: > > What happens if / when someone doesn’t? > > A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP > pages. If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are > non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to > their drop lists. Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists. > > A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time. Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming resources. A more productive path to evaluate. Thanks, Leo -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
