On 12/05/2025 17:07, Paul Wouters wrote:

On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:25 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr%2bi...@sandelman.ca>> wrote:


    Hi, how about this text:

    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/pull/149

    {{?I-D.ietf-uta-require-tls13}} allows for continued use of TLS
    1.2 for operational reasons.

    {{RFC8995}} restricted itself to requiring TLS 1.2 (but not less)
    for a
    number of reasons including: the need for mutual TLS, and the need
    for FIPS
    certified modules on router and IoT platforms that have long software
    lifecycles,


I would remove the "need for mutual TLS" as that was supposed by TLS 1.1/1.0 as well.

    and often also include hardware offload of cryptographic options.
    FIPS certification is not done on software, but on the binary, and
    those
    binary distributions are often part of a different software
    lifecycle than
    the applications that run on top of it.


I would remove the two occurances of "FIPS", to make the document apply more generically
in other parts of the world as well.

    On the Registrar and MASA side, mutual TLS authentication combined
    with
    hardware TLS offload requires specific support for extensions,
    such as those
    provided by {{?RFC9440}}.


Looks fine.

    TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 do client authentication at a different point
    in the
    state machine, many frameworks do not at the time of this writing
    support
    both in a bug free manner.


I would rewrite this or delete it. An RFC mentioning "bugs at this time" will age poorly. Perhaps something along the lines of "While TLS 1.3 is widely supported in clients and servers on generic OS and mobile platforms, its support is less widespread in other types of devices, necessitating continued support for TLS 1.2. Implementations that support both TLS 1.2 and 1.3 should follow the generic guidlines of RFC8449 to negotiate the highest mutually shared version of TLS."

Paul

I like Paul's suggestions, the above proposed text does address my concerns.

If you make a new revision based on this email, I'll be most happy to conclude my DISCUSS. Thank you for your patience,

Best wishes,

Gorry

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to