Gorry Fairhurst <go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> For my side, I will be happy to clear my DISCUSS when the text explains
the
> current relationship to draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13, and I think you may
> already have the thoughts behind that above. I am looking forward to a
text
> proposal.You want me to explain in BRSKI-PRM, which updates RFC8995, why RFC8995 is completely compliant with the intention of uta-require-tls13, but is not apparently consistent with the text, because uta-require-tls13 uses BCP14 keywords incorrectly? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
