> The posted I-D includes all of those changes, so the DT diff already includes
> that.
Ok, good to know! Still I'll wait until the PRs are merged so that I can do a
new PR on top of that with "editorial cleanup".
Esko
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
Sent: donderdag 27 maart 2025 13:38
To: Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl>; anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Details of proposed voucher "extensions" in Github PR
Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
> I've reviewed the open PRs at: https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/pulls
> For most of these, I would say go ahead and merge.
okay, I said I'd wait until April 1-ish.
> Once merged, people interested can do a thorough review of the entire set
of changes.
The posted I-D includes all of those changes, so the DT diff already includes
that.
>> I noticed btw, that there was no SID allocation for manufacturer-private
in
>> the document. I will fix that in the next few days. I made something
up for
>> the slides :-)
> In PR #81 the YANG leaf is introduced, but no SID number it seems.
Yes.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
