Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
>> Does the manufacturer-private satisfy your need here?
> Yes, this looks fine. The issue of "hidden communication channel" that
> was raised for this field, would equally be there for standardized
> extensions that import from other YANG modules. E.g. I can always find
> a bstr field from some arbitrary other YANG module, use it as
> extension, and store my hidden data in there.
I noticed btw, that there was no SID allocation for manufacturer-private in
the document. I will fix that in the next few days. I made something up for
the slides :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
