Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> Why can't we simply have an array of records in the voucher model,
> where each entry has an "IDentifier" , a boolean "public" and a binary
> value blob.
Yes, that's basically what I've done.
> If public=true it means that the syntax and semantic of the binary blob
> is publically documented.
I'm not sure this is useful to do it that way.
It doesn't matter whether or not it's publically documented, but rather
whether a Registrar has been told about it. A Registrar made last year
would not know about public documents that came out this year. At the same
time, a vendor-proprietary extension might be told to an operator under NDA,
which would not make it public.
In
>> https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/pull/81
I've defined a leaf (attributed) called "manufacturer-private", which is a
mostly opaque byte string that the manufacturer can put anything they like.
I say "mostly", because the suggestion is that it's a bstr (CBOR), which can
contain any valid CBOR. Or, in JSON land, it's JSON, having been base64URL
encoded to a string.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
