Thank you, Michael and Esko. I had apparently misunderstood the case
you were after. My apologies. Good luck sorting out the best way to
handle this situation which, as you say, is quite different from the
usual protocol assumptions.
Yours,
Joel
On 3/13/2025 4:37 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> Is there an assumption that the guy providing the blob and the guy
> processing the blob are from the same vendor? (E. G. The Blob is
Yes.
The vouchers are created by the vendors MASA (Manufacturer Authorized Signing
Authority), and are processed by the same vendor's Pledge.
In between them is the Registrar, which belongs to the network operator.
So there is a tension between things the vendor wants to do, vs what the
Registrar can process. That's why we want the "innovation" to be slightly
more controlled.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
