https://www.iana.org/assignments/brski-parameters/
lists a table like:
URI Description Reference
This registry was added very late in the RFC8995 process, and probably did
not get enough sober review. The descriptions that RFC8995 provides for the
four existing things are really asinine. (It's okay: I can call myself this)
Further, the heading "URI" is really wrong.
draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm more correctly says, "Path Segment" for that heading.
which is what it really is.
So we have to write a new RFC to amend this, or can it just being an IESG
action?
(or tag this into some omnibus RFC)
Nothing significant changes.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
