On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the updates, and for BRSKI-38.
Indeed -- thank you for the new version. W > > Regards > Brian > > On 12-Mar-20 06:58, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I think there are still some inconsistencies in the > > > examples to resolve: > > > > > The MASA cert/key is identical to the "manufacturer key pair for > > IDevID > > > > ... > > > > All fixed, Max Pritikin double checked them, which resulted in a sentence of > > clarification, which I thought I posted on Monday, but I didn't actually. > > > > I think I did post -37 two weeks ago (Feb 26, I think) to the WG ML asking > > for others to check my work before I bother Ben again. > > > > the one sentence fix: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-37&url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-38 > > > > the new examples: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-37&url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-38 > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
