Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Could those on the hook for the ACP and BRSKI drafts, which have been > very seriously delayed, update the WG with the plan for getting them > approved? It seems to me that there has been endless nitpicking, of the > kind that is appropriate for full Standard status, but very surprising > for Proposed Standard where there is no expectation of perfection.
I don't know what kind of plan I can relate: It seems to be above my pay grade.
For BRSKI, since IETF106, all DISCUSSes, except Ben Kaduk's desire to have
the examples redone have been cleared. I had originally tagged redoing that
for AUTH48 time, since all IANA allocations would be done by then.
All allocations have been done at this point, and in January I redid the
examples in the non-normative Appendix with the right OIDs. Ben found some
errors (one repeated certificate), and so I generated the examples again.
I then asked Jim Schaad and Max Pritikin (a BRSKI co-author, who has been
redirected on other important Cisco work), to validate. Max reviewed, and
this resulted in an additional clarifiying sentence committed to the github.
(I thought I posted it on Monday, I don't seem to have. I will do that now.
Warren Kumari has taken over as the sponsoring AD.
> Can we expect these drafts to be approved in the next one or two weeks,
> for example? If not then, when?
I know that ACP has gone through a similar set of DISCUSSes, and I think that
they are mostly all done.
I don't see an update from Ben.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane/ballot/
says that most have No Objections, rather than Yes. Three YES are needed to
override a DISCUSS.
I guess this document has been in front of the IESG since 2018 when Terry was
an AD!
I think that the WG participants need to actively engage the DISCUSSes and
the choices that the WG has made.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
