Steffen,
This is fine. Lets see that all proposed discussion items re. further
BRSKI work is submitted as a proposed ANIMA WG meeting agenda item.
We have also in the past accepted agenda items that "only" had slides or
where even discussions without slides. If we see that the currently
asked for amount of time for ANIMA is not sufficient to cover the
proposed items of interest, especially ffor BRSKI, we will discuss with
IETF if we can get a longer or second slot.
Cheers
Toerless
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 02:22:05PM +0000, Fries, Steffen wrote:
> Hi Sheng, hi Eliot,
>
> I think I would probably need around 15 minutes. Or depending on what is
> left. From my point of view it would be motivating the work in the first
> step..
>
> Best regards
> Steffen
>
>
> From: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>
> Sent: Montag, 11. Februar 2019 09:37
> To: Eliot Lear <[email protected]>
> Cc: Fries, Steffen (CT RDA ITS) <[email protected]>; Toerless Eckert
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Brockhaus, Hendrik (CT
> RDA ITS SEA-DE) <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [Anima] New work item proposal / agenda request
>
> Hi, Eliot,
>
> Thanks for the information. Noted. We will see how the proposed charter goes
> with the approving procedure by the time. It is now in the hand of our
> responsible AD.
>
> Sheng
>
> From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 2:59 PM
> To: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: Fries, Steffen
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Toerless
> Eckert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Brockhaus, Hendrik
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [Anima] New work item proposal / agenda request
>
> Hi Sheng,
>
> IMHO this would be a good topic to be part of the recharter discussion, and
> so I would suggest that it come before that. And I think perhaps we indicate
> the other future work going on with BRSKI.
>
> Eliot
>
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Sheng Jiang
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Hi, Steffen,
>
> How much time do you need? I will try my best to match your request. However,
> giving we are in the recharter procedure, we are not sure how much time would
> be needed for the charter discussion (if our new charter got approved before
> the meeting, then the time would be relevant short). Therefore, I cannot
> guarantee you the time length yet.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sheng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fries, Steffen [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2019 12:44 AM
> To: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Sheng Jiang
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Brockhaus, Hendrik
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: RE: New work item proposal / agenda request
>
> Hi Toerless,
>
> Sounds great. Looking forward to the meeting.
>
> Best regards
> Steffen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Februar 2019 13:26
> To: Fries, Steffen (CT RDA ITS)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> Brockhaus, Hendrik (CT RDA ITS SEA-DE)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: New work item proposal / agenda request
>
> Steffen,
>
> This should be fine on the agenda. Sheng usually runs the agenda, he
> is out this week (chinese new year). Consider yourself top in queue of
> new work items ;-)
>
> Cheers
> Toerless
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:12:10PM +0000, Fries, Steffen wrote:
> Hello Toerless, hello Sheng,
>
> Based on the discussion we had in December about support of
> asynchronous operation/enrollment support in BRSKI on the mailing
> list, I'm preparing a contribution for the next IETF meeting. The work
> is based on requirements from industrial and IoT scenarios and targets
> the proposal a supporting self-contained objects as an extension to the
> currently defined BRSKI to support asynchronous operation during enrolment.
>
> I'm currently preparing the draft contribution together with Hendrik
> ( a colleague) and would like to ask for a slot in the agenda. I
> saw the agenda request for an ANIMA WG meeting and was not sure how
> far advanced the planning of the meeting agenda already is. Just wanted to
> ensure we're not too late. I will submit the draft in time before the next
> meeting.
>
> Best regards
> Steffen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
