Hi Sheng, IMHO this would be a good topic to be part of the recharter discussion, and so I would suggest that it come before that. And I think perhaps we indicate the other future work going on with BRSKI.
Eliot > On 11 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Steffen, > > How much time do you need? I will try my best to match your request. However, > giving we are in the recharter procedure, we are not sure how much time would > be needed for the charter discussion (if our new charter got approved before > the meeting, then the time would be relevant short). Therefore, I cannot > guarantee you the time length yet. > > Regards, > > Sheng > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Fries, Steffen [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2019 12:44 AM >> To: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; Brockhaus, Hendrik <[email protected]> >> Subject: RE: New work item proposal / agenda request >> >> Hi Toerless, >> >> Sounds great. Looking forward to the meeting. >> >> Best regards >> Steffen >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Freitag, 8. Februar 2019 13:26 >>> To: Fries, Steffen (CT RDA ITS) <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; >>> Brockhaus, Hendrik (CT RDA ITS SEA-DE) <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: New work item proposal / agenda request >>> >>> Steffen, >>> >>> This should be fine on the agenda. Sheng usually runs the agenda, he >>> is out this week (chinese new year). Consider yourself top in queue of >>> new work items ;-) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Toerless >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:12:10PM +0000, Fries, Steffen wrote: >>>> Hello Toerless, hello Sheng, >>>> >>>> Based on the discussion we had in December about support of >>>> asynchronous operation/enrollment support in BRSKI on the mailing >>> list, I'm preparing a contribution for the next IETF meeting. The work >>> is based on requirements from industrial and IoT scenarios and targets >>> the proposal a supporting self-contained objects as an extension to the >> currently defined BRSKI to support asynchronous operation during enrolment. >>>> >>>> I'm currently preparing the draft contribution together with Hendrik >>>> ( a colleague) and would like to ask for a slot in the agenda. I >>> saw the agenda request for an ANIMA WG meeting and was not sure how >>> far advanced the planning of the meeting agenda already is. Just wanted to >> ensure we're not too late. I will submit the draft in time before the next >> meeting. >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Steffen >>>> > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
