Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem is that the manufacturer doesn't have enough context to > make decisions as to which network to join. That is the challenge.
So... who knows then?
I'm asking seriously.
You are looking down (like god) with knowledge that apparently isn't in the
network.
So please explain.
> On 12.07.18 17:12, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
>> involved. What a manufacturer wants to avoid is a pledge joining a
>> network where the MASA just does the logging and does no validation,
>> without any other means to determine that the device is on the
>> correct network. Otherwise, the pledge (we could call it the
>> "station" in this context) could simply home to the wrong network,
>> and even resetting the device won't get you to the right network.
> I don't understand how the "manufacturer" can have a desire ("the pledge
> avoid joining a network ...") that is different from the MASA's desire.
> The MASA *is* the expression manufacturer's desire.
> If the manufacturer has sales channel information that indicates the
Pledge
> is on the wrong network, it should not issue a voucher.
> So the situation you describe makes no sense to me.
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Alternatives:
> ----------------------------------------------------
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
