And the solution is NOT to increase your thread priority so you can better
"fight" with the system.  You will get better results by putting in the
sleep so you aren't fighting.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Justin (Google Employee) 
<j...@google.com>wrote:

>
> The recommendation for this is to sleep in the touch event handler.
> The system will send you touch events as fast as you can process them.
> If you artificially decrease this by sleeping in the handler, you will
> allow more processing time for other threads which are theoretically
> running your computations for screen updates.
>
> Cheers,
> Justin
> Android Team @ Google
>
> On Aug 10, 9:38 am, sahn0 <dmitry.sk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, it is.
> >
> > Try SpriteMethodTest, set 100 sprites, select OpenGL / Use VBO,  let
> > it run for a while. You will get something around 20ms / 50 fps. Now
> > run it second time, and simply touch screen while test is running. You
> > will get something around 35ms / 29 fps. So it is 15 ms difference.
> >
> > As I understand, the answer is simple - it is that dispatcher thread
> > running with THREAD_PRIORITY_URGENT_DISPLAY priority.
> >
> > Setting THREAD_PRIORITY_URGENT_DISPLAY priority (will it work on non-
> > ADP firmware?) on renderer thread yields 30 ms / 33 fps.
> >
> > Are there any other workarounds?
> >
>


-- 
Dianne Hackborn
Android framework engineer
hack...@android.com

Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
answer them.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to