On 17/10/17 04:52 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > Dear Michel, > Michel Dänzer wrote on 17.10.2017 11:20: >> On 16/10/17 06:21 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: >>> Michel Dänzer wrote on 16.10.2017 18:05: >>>> On 16/10/17 05:53 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> But when I look at my Xorg.0.log or the output of eglinfo, I see the >>>>> following >>>>> lines: >>>>> - Xorg.0.log: [ 15.305] (II) glamor: EGL version 1.5 (DRI2): >>>>> - eglinfo: EGL version string: 1.5 (DRI2) >>>>> >>>>> My understanding was, that amdgpu supports DRI3 for quite some time now >>>>> and >>>>> therefore would expect to see something like "EGL version string: 1.5 >>>>> (DRI3)". >>>>> >>>>> What am I missing? >>>> >>>> Only that those messages are about a different "DRI2" than the >>>> alternative to DRI3. >>> >>> ah, I was not aware of that. What „DRI“ is meant here then? >> >> The API exposed by *_dri.so to the EGL runtime. It's called "DRI2" >> because it had to be changed from the original API when DRI2 was >> introduced. However, that wasn't necessary for DRI3. > > thank you for the explanation! Is there any chance that this could be > disambiguated? Maybe by adding a „MESA-“ to the string, which is returned as > the > EGL version string. Would a "patch" for this be welcome?
I can't speak on behalf of all Mesa developers who would review it. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
