On 16/10/17 05:53 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > [Please CC me on all replies, I'm not subscribed to amd-gfx.] > > Hey, > I'm not sure whether this is a bug or if I'm just missing something. I've got > the following stack (Debian testing as a base): > GPU: Hawaii PRO [Radeon R9 290] (ChipID = 0x67b1) > Mesa: Git:master/c7a81dcea9 > libdrm: 2.4.84-2 > LLVM: SVN:trunk/r315850 (6.0 devel) > X.Org: 2:1.19.3-2 > Linux: 4.13.7 > Firmware (firmware-amd-graphics): 20170823-1 > libclc: Git:master/df9db2adca > DDX (xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu): 1.4.0-1 > > In my xorg.conf I have (and if I read the manpage correctly, the »Option "DRI" > "3"« line shouldn't even be necessary anymore): >> Section "Device" >> Identifier "Forced to amdgpu with DRI3" >> Driver "amdgpu" >> Option "DRI" "3" >> EndSection > > But when I look at my Xorg.0.log or the output of eglinfo, I see the following > lines: > - Xorg.0.log: [ 15.305] (II) glamor: EGL version 1.5 (DRI2): > - eglinfo: EGL version string: 1.5 (DRI2) > > My understanding was, that amdgpu supports DRI3 for quite some time now and > therefore would expect to see something like "EGL version string: 1.5 (DRI3)". > > What am I missing?
Only that those messages are about a different "DRI2" than the alternative to DRI3. Setting LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose when running a client prints on stderr whether it's using DRI3 or DRI2. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
