[Public]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Slaby <jirisl...@kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 12:39 AM
> To: Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: patc...@lists.linux.dev; Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>; Koenig,
> Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <xinhui....@amd.com>;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 090/263] drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the param type of
> set_power_profile_mode
>
> On 19. 08. 24, 22:12, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> > [Public]
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jiri Slaby <jirisl...@kernel.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 3:54 AM
> >> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>;
> >> sta...@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: patc...@lists.linux.dev; Deucher, Alexander
> >> <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>; Koenig,
> >> Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui
> >> <xinhui....@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 090/263] drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the param type
> >> of set_power_profile_mode
> >>
> >> FTR:
> >> Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
> >> Ma Jun (jun....@amd.com)
> >> The email address you entered couldn't be found
> >>
> >> So the author of the patch CANNOT respond. Anyone else?
> >
> > This was a Coverity fix.  As to why it was pulled into stable, I think 
> > Sasha's
> scripts picked it up.
>
> Sorry, but again, why do we change the kernel to _silence_ Coverity? We do
> not do this even for compilers.
>
> I am asking, why do you call this a fix at all? What does it fixes?

I don't think this is stable material.  As I said, it got picked up by a script 
that nominates patches for stable.  I guess more people need to review the 
patches that get nominated for stable.  I personally can't keep up with all of 
them.

Alex

>
> And finally, Coverity has a "False positive" selection box to dismiss a 
> warning
> for good. One needs not changing the code.
>
> thanks,
> --
> js
> suse labs

Reply via email to