On 19. 08. 24, 22:12, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
[Public]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Slaby <jirisl...@kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 3:54 AM
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>;
sta...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: patc...@lists.linux.dev; Deucher, Alexander
<alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>; Koenig,
Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <xinhui....@amd.com>;
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 090/263] drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the param type of
set_power_profile_mode

FTR:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
Ma Jun (jun....@amd.com)
The email address you entered couldn't be found

So the author of the patch CANNOT respond. Anyone else?

This was a Coverity fix.  As to why it was pulled into stable, I think Sasha's 
scripts picked it up.

Sorry, but again, why do we change the kernel to _silence_ Coverity? We do not do this even for compilers.

I am asking, why do you call this a fix at all? What does it fixes?

And finally, Coverity has a "False positive" selection box to dismiss a warning for good. One needs not changing the code.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs

Reply via email to